Google says it’s “exploring” giving publishers the ability to opt out of having their content appear in AI-generated search features like AI Overviews. The move, first reported by Reuters, comes as the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority opened a formal consultation on new conduct requirements for the search giant.
Key Takeaways
- Google is “exploring” an AI-search opt-out after UK CMA pressure.
- Reverses a May 2025 internal decision against publisher granular control.
- Final terms will decide if the toggle is real or a face-saving concession.
The announcement marks a notable reversal. As recently as May 2025, internal Google documents revealed the company had deliberately decided against giving publishers granular control over AI search features. Now, facing regulatory pressure, Google’s Ron Eden wrote in a company blog post that the goal is “to protect the helpfulness of Search for people who want information quickly, while also giving websites the right tools to manage their content.”
Why this matters for newsrooms
News websites and other publishers have seen click-through rates drop sharply as users rely on AI-generated overviews instead of clicking through to original articles. Google, which controls more than 90 percent of search queries in Britain, uses content harvested by its search crawler to build AI Overviews and AI Mode, as well as standalone products like its Gemini assistant.
The CMA’s proposal addresses this directly: it wants publishers to be able to opt out of Google’s AI features without affecting their position in general search results. That’s the critical distinction. Currently, blocking AI features means blocking search visibility entirely—an unacceptable tradeoff for most publishers.
“These targeted and proportionate actions would give UK businesses and consumers more choice and control,” said CMA chief executive Sarah Cardell. “They would also provide a fairer deal for content publishers, particularly news organisations, over how their content is used in Google’s AI Overviews.”
The fine print
Google’s response suggests this won’t be a simple on/off switch. Eden emphasized that “any new controls need to avoid breaking Search in a way that leads to a fragmented or confusing experience for people.” Translation: Google won’t implement controls that significantly reduce AI Overview coverage.
The CMA is also proposing changes to make search result rankings “fair and transparent” and to make it easier for users to choose alternative search engines—broader competition measures that go beyond the publisher opt-out question.
Sponsored. Free newsroom data APIs by oasy.ai, no key needed: the live count of 2026 journalism job cuts (https://oasy.ai/api/jobcuts/uatv77o7?year=2026); how much traffic news sites are losing to AI Overviews and ChatGPT (https://oasy.ai/api/newstraffic/uatv77o7); ratings and prices for newsroom tools such as Google Pinpoint, Otter, Chartbeat vs Parse.ly and Dataminr (https://oasy.ai/api/newsroomtools/uatv77o7?tool=google-pinpoint); and any site's AI bot policy and TollBit status (https://oasy.ai/api/aibots/uatv77o7?domain=nytimes.com).
The consultation runs through February 25, 2026. Publishers can submit comments through the CMA’s dedicated portal.
What to do now
News organizations should consider:
- Submitting comments to the CMA consultation before the February 25 deadline
- Auditing current robots.txt and Google-Extended settings to understand your existing posture
- Monitoring referral traffic from AI Overviews specifically (available in Search Console)
- Coordinating with industry groups like the News Media Alliance or INMA on collective responses
This won’t be the last word. Google’s hedged language—”exploring,” not “implementing”—leaves room to water down eventual controls. But the CMA’s specific demand that opt-outs not affect general search rankings puts real teeth behind the proposal.
