Apple is considering spending at least $100 million to license news for its revamped Siri assistant, with publishers paid based on how often their reporting is used, according to Nieman Lab.
Apple has discussed a variable compensation plan that would pay publishers when Siri uses their reporting, rather than the flat licensing fees common in many AI content deals.
Apple already uses a similar model with Apple News+. Payments to publishers are based in part on the share of engagement their content generates on the platform, an approach that has also drawn complaints from publishers.
Apple first announced the revamped Siri in 2024, but its release has been delayed several times. It is now expected later this year. Beta testers at WIRED and The Verge have reported significant improvements, increasing Apple’s need for reliable, up-to-date news sources that Siri can use to answer questions about current events.
Apple is not building the new Siri alone. The company has a deal to use Google’s Gemini models for the assistant, and the Apple-Google partnership has already drawn antitrust scrutiny. That means publishers licensing content to Apple could also see their reporting used by an assistant powered in part by Google’s technology.
Usage-based payments have support elsewhere in the AI industry. Sam Altman has backed micropayments for AI agents as a way to compensate publishers when their content is used. The model could lower costs for AI companies, but it would also make licensing revenue less predictable for publishers and raise questions about how usage is measured and verified.
For publishers, Apple’s proposal adds another model to a growing mix of AI licensing arrangements. Meta licensed Newsmax content for AI search across its apps on undisclosed terms, while Google has changed how publisher links appear in AI Overviews, including by adding Top Stories carousels to some trending news queries. The approaches place different values on publisher content, from licensing fees and clicks to citations and individual uses. For publishers negotiating with Apple, a key question will be how those uses are counted and whether they can independently verify the data.
The potential payments are also small compared with the traffic losses publishers are facing. A $100 million pool divided among dozens of outlets would do little to offset declining search referrals, including a drop among UK publishers
No deals have been announced. The Wall Street Journal reported that discussions are underway, and Apple has not publicly detailed the proposal. The final terms, if agreements are reached, could show how much leverage publishers have as Apple looks for news content to support the new Siri.
